Whether you work in post, audio engineering, sound design, game audio, or any other A/V-heavy workflow, there’s one kind of remixing everyone hates – when Zoom and your internet connection team up to turn your screenshare into an unrecognizable glitch-fest.
At best, it’s an annoying way to collaborate. At worst, it undermines client confidence – even though the real problem is the pipeline, not the work.
If you’ve ever watched a producer react to distorted playback or robotic vocals, you’ve probably asked the same question: isn’t there a better way to share what I’m working on?
Zoom offers workarounds, but they require effort. Zoom was never built for high-definition, accurate media review, so it takes deliberate setup to get usable results.
Below, we'll walk through why Zoom struggles with DAW streaming, how to stream your DAW on Zoom with minimal lag and artifacting, and point you to better alternatives when precision actually matters.
What’s the problem with streaming your DAW over Zoom?
Zoom wasn't designed for high-fidelity media workflows. It excels at meetings, presentations, and virtual presence. When paired with CPU-intensive tools like Pro Tools, Ableton, Logic Pro, or other editing software, it prioritizes keeping things moving smoothly (though "smoothly" can be a very loose term).
Zoom acknowledges this limitation, noting that shared content quality depends heavily on system load and that it will automatically reduce resolution to maintain performance:
“Zoom may reduce the resolution to maintain quality and smoothness depending on content and CPU.”
For presentations, this trade-off isn’t a dealbreaker. But when you’re streaming real-time audio or video that needs any kind of accuracy (by frame, millisecond, etc.), resolution downscaling, latency, and dropped frames disrupt the very feedback you’re trying to gather.
Here are a few things you can try
1. Try an alternative
Sometimes the easiest “fix” isn’t a workaround at all – it’s to step away from Zoom entirely. If you regularly stream high-fidelity DAW playback for clients and collaborators, switching to a platform built for creative review, like Evercast, becomes essential rather than optional.
Evercast was designed for remote creative teams sharing high-definition, frame-accurate picture and clean, synced audio from anywhere globally. The platform includes integrated video chat and annotation, so you can collaborate and get feedback in real-time. It provides low-latency streaming (>100ms globally) while eliminating glitchy workarounds.
The setup is easy, the interface similarly intuitive, and it comes loaded with features tailored towards even the most high-demand creative teams and projects, including:
- Broadcasting up to 4K/60fps from virtually any source, including live cameras, creative software, and media files, all in real time
- Studio-quality streaming with full-spectrum audio, multi-channel surround sound (5.1 and 7.1), and color precision up to 10-bit 4:4:4 color
- Session recording with interactive playback
- 24/7 white-glove technical support
- Seamless integration across platforms, including macOS, Windows, iOS, and Apple TV
- Enterprise-level security features such as encryption, watermarking, two-factor authentication (for joining secure sessions), and SSO integration
Create together remotely, in real time
2. Use OBS and NDI to broadcast your DAW in Zoom
If you’re determined to stay on Zoom but want something more refined than basic screen share, pairing your DAW with broadcast tools like OBS Studio (Open Broadcasting Software) and NDI can help. Think of OBS as a control room that packages your audio and video into a virtual feed, which NDI can then route into Zoom as a camera source.
This gives you more flexibility – cleaner routing, better preview control, and sometimes smoother playback – but it’s not plug-and-play. You still need to spend time assigning sources, testing NDI bandwidth, managing your CPU load, and verifying sync before every session.
When it works, it feels like you’ve outsmarted Zoom. When it doesn’t… well, you’re right back to troubleshooting instead of mixing.
3. Ditch video chat and lean into screen share and audio
One way to make Zoom more stable is to disable all participant webcams and run the session using only screen share and DAW audio. Video feeds consume a significant amount of bandwidth and processing power, and turning them off frees Zoom to prioritize audio playback instead of juggling multiple video streams.
Of course, a lot can be lost without face-to-face interaction, let alone the ability to articulate with body language, but it does still work for audio-based sessions, quick approvals, or light weight review. It won’t completely solve stereo collapse, compression artifacts, or glitching, but it does provide a more stable platform that strikes a better balance of effort and output than a standard Zoom meeting alone.
4. Use a webcam to broadcast another monitor to Zoom
Yes, this is as inelegant as it sounds – and yet people genuinely use it because it bypasses Zoom’s screen-sharing compression entirely. One computer runs the DAW while a second runs Zoom with a webcam pointed at the other.
It’s crude, but it does come with a key advantage: avoiding most CPU bottlenecking and constant frame-dropping issues. The trade-off? You’re essentially streaming video of a screen, which means moiré patterns, color inaccuracies, glare, and other environmental factors can still compromise accuracy and integrity.
This method works for “show me what you’re working on” moments… just don’t be surprised if that’s followed by “oh, I didn’t mean literally.”
5. Design your own A/V Franken-rig
If you’re into patch bays, virtual buses, redundant machines, and enough HDMI cables to lasso a herd of wild horses, you could build something yourself that addresses any number of issues often created by Zoom in the first place.
You could allocate resources across systems to improve playback quality and accuracy, piece together several pieces of software to handle all your collaboration and feedback needs (video chat, voice chat, annotation), or even collate your sources into a singular hub (like OBS) to broadcast through other streaming or media sharing platforms.
It absolutely can work – some studios run elaborate setups like this every day – but you’ll likely spend more time calibrating than creating. What’s worse, is that they simply don’t scale. If a setup like this allows your work, team, and business to grow – more power to you. But when you finally get to that next level, chances are you’ll be looking for something that ultimately solves all of these problems at once – instead of trading some for others.
When you’re ready to ditch the complex workarounds and go with a solution that makes it feel like your whole team is together in the same room, check out Evercast.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
